The best way to determine “who gets what” depends on the specific resource being distributed, the policy goals, and the broader societal values at play. Policymakers should make these determinations based on a combination of equity, efficiency, and need while considering tradeoffs between fairness, economic impact, and administrative feasibility. Key Approaches for Determining “Who Gets What” Merit-Based Distribution – Resources are allocated based on qualifications, achievements, or contributions (e.g., scholarships, job promotions). Tradeoff: Can incentivize productivity but may disadvantage historically marginalized groups. Need-Based Distribution – Allocation is based on necessity, prioritizing those with the greatest need (e.g., food assistance, healthcare subsidies). Tradeoff: Ensures basic needs are met but may discourage self-sufficiency. Market-Based Distribution – Goods and services are allocated based on purchasing power (e.g., housing, consumer goods). Tradeoff: Encourages economic growth but can lead to disparities if affordability is a barrier. Universal Distribution – Resources are provided equally to everyone (e.g., public education, Social Security). Tradeoff: Promotes fairness but may allocate resources to those who don’t need them, leading to inefficiencies. Lottery or Random Selection – When demand exceeds supply, random allocation is used (e.g., visa lotteries, school choice programs). Tradeoff: Ensures equal opportunity but does not consider individual merit or need. Key Considerations for Policymakers Equity vs. Equality – Should resources be distributed equally or proportionally based on need? Efficiency vs. Fairness – Policies should be administratively feasible while maintaining fairness. Short-Term vs. Long-Term Impact – Will the policy address immediate needs or foster long-term sustainability? Public Perception & Political Feasibility – Will the public perceive the policy as just and effective? Ultimately, a balanced, context-specific approach is necessary. Policymakers should use a mix of these strategies depending on the policy area (e.g., healthcare might prioritize need, while higher education may balance merit and financial aid). Tradeoffs are inevitable, but decisions should be guided by ethical considerations and data-driven outcomes.

Outcomes data are from the May 2025 undergraduate graduating class. Results are based on a combination of University surveys, departmental surveys, and social media research.

The information below is available for download.

What Catholic U Students Are Doing

breakdown.jpeg

Class of 2025 Employers

Class of 2025 Graduate Schools

What Catholic U Students Are Earning

salary.png

Salary Ranges 26% of 591 Seniors Reported Salary 29,999 and Below 8% 30,000- 39,999 5% 40,000 - 49,999 13% 50,000 - 59,999 13% 60,000 - 69,999 17% 70,000 and Up 44%

Where Catholic U Students Interned



Class of 2025 Internships